Neurosymbolic AI: The Architecture of a Semantic Neural Network. How to Teach LLMs to Calculate
LLMs fail at elementary math. Corporations spend billions, but ultimately are forced to attach calculators to computing machines of incredible power. All attempts to fix this via Chain-of-Thought, fine-tuning on arithmetic tasks, or context expansion have failed.I conducted a series of experiments to understand why, and came to the conclusion that neural networks are simply not meant for discrete arithmetic. Their true purpose is continuous transformations.This article describes the implementation of a novel neural network architecture that combines the precision of symbolic AI with the generalization capabilities of LLMs. As always, experiments and code are included.I will traditionally skip the philosophical foundations that led to this solution.TL;DR: LLMs make arithmetic mistakes not due to a lack of data or parameters—neural networks are fundamentally not designed for discrete calculations. They evolved (much like the biological brain) for continuous transformations and pattern recognition. The solution is not to teach them to count, but to embed an algebraic processor.
[AI ⊂ TM] Машина Тьюринга и искусственный интеллект
ПререквизитыОбязательно - основы теории вычислений, искусственные нейронные сети.Желательно - генетические алгоритмы, RL-агенты.Почему машина Тьюринга?Действительно, почему машина Тьюринга (TM) сегодня в теме про искусственный интеллект (AI) ? Ведь AI сегодня это все больше про машинное обучение (ML), искусственные нейронные сети (

